Cancer Impacts Prognosis on Mortality in Patients with Acute Heart Failure: Analysis of the EPICTER Study.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) and cancer are currently the leading causes of death worldwide, with an increasing incidence with age. Little is known about the treatment received and the prognosis of patients with acute HF and a prior cancer diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: to determine the clinical characteristics, palliative treatment received, and prognostic impact of patients with acute HF and a history of solid tumor. METHODS: The EPICTER study ("Epidemiological survey of advanced heart failure") is a cross-sectional, multicenter project that consecutively collected patients admitted for acute HF in 74 Spanish hospitals. Patients were classified into two groups according to whether they met criteria for acute HF with and without solid cancer, and the groups were subsequently compared. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted, using the forward stepwise method. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of solid tumor on prognosis in patients with acute HF. RESULTS: A total of 3127 patients were included, of which 394 patients (13%) had a prior diagnosis of some type of solid cancer. Patients with a history of cancer presented a greater frequency of weight loss at admission: 18% vs. 12% (p = 0.030). In the cancer group, functional impairment was noted more frequently: 43% vs. 35%, p = 0.039). Patients with a history of solid cancer more frequently presented with acute HF with preserved ejection fraction (65% vs. 58%, p = 0.048) than reduced or mildly reduced. In-hospital and 6-month follow-up mortality was 31% (110/357) in patients with solid cancer vs. 26% (637/2466), p = 0.046. CONCLUSION: Our investigation demonstrates that in-hospital mortality and mortality during 6-month follow-up in patients with acute HF were higher in those subjects with a history of concomitant solid tumor cancer diagnosis.

[Emphysematous cystitis and emphysematous pyelonephritis]. / Cistitis y pielonefritis enfisematosa.

Emphysematous cystitis and emphysematous pyelonephritis are rare entities, difficult to diagnose and with high morbidity and mortality. The non-specificity of the medical history and the little usefulness of laboratory tests contribute to diagnostic delay, which increases the possibility of therapeutic failure. We present 2 cases, one of cystitis and another of emphysematous pyelonephritis, who attended the emergency room due to severe urinary sepsis. Despite severity of the symptoms, conservative management was performed with bladder drainage and antibiotic treatment, without interventions or surgeries, presenting a favorable evolution and resolution of the infectious process. Each case must be individualized to offer the best possible therapeutic alternative.

Varicela, afectación palmo-plantar y neumonía / Varicella, palmoplantar involvement and pneumonia

La varicela es una enfermedad propia de la infancia; su presentación en adultos es muy poco frecuente y suele asociarse a cuadros de mayor gravedad y afectación sistémica. Se presenta como un exantema generalizado de diseminación centrípeta, pruriginoso y pleomórfico, de predominio facial y troncular, que respeta las extremidades. La neumonía es la complicación extracutánea más frecuente y la principal causa de hospitalización en este grupo etario. La afectación palmo-plantar es excepcional y suele estar asociada a enfermedad diseminada en pacientes con importante comorbilidad o algún tipo inmunosupresión. Presentamos el caso de un paciente de 71 años que presenta enfermedad varicelosa diseminada, caracterizada por neumonía y afectación palmo-plantar, en el contexto de tratamiento con corticoides

Varicella is a childhood disease; it occurs very rarely in adults, usually associated with more severe cases and systemic involvement. It presents as a generalized rash of centripetal spread, pruritic and pleomorphic, occurring in the face and trunk but not in the limbs. Pneumonia is the most frequent extracutaneous complication and the leading cause of hospitalization among this age group. Palmoplantar involvement is uncommon, usually associated with disseminated disease in patients with significant comorbidity or some kind of immunosuppression. We present the case of a 71-year-old patient with disseminated varicella infection, characterized by pneumonia and palmoplantar involvement, and treated with corticosteroids

[Clinical value of the ankle-brachial index in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease but without known atherothrombotic disease: VITAMIN study]. / Valor de la determinación del índice tobillo-brazo en pacientes de riesgo vascular sin enfermedad aterotrombótica conocida: estudio VITAMIN.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Detecting peripheral arterial disease by measuring the ankle-brachial index can help identify asymptomatic patients with established disease. We investigated the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (i.e., an ankle-brachial index <0.9) and its potential clinical and therapeutic impact in patients with no known arterial disease who were seen at internal medicine departments. METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study included patients at risk of cardiovascular disease who were selected on the basis of age, gender and the presence of conventional risk factors. No patient was known to have arterial disease. RESULTS: The study included 493 patients, 174 (35%) of whom had diabetes, while 321 (65%) did not. Only 16% were in a low-risk category according to their Framingham score. An ankle-brachial index <0.9 was observed in 27.4%, comprising 37.9% of those with diabetes and 21.3% of those without. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors associated with an ankle-brachial index <0.9 were age, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia. There was a significant relationship between the ankle-brachial index and Framingham risk categories. Therapeutically, only 21% of patients with an ankle brachial index <0.9 were taking antiplatelet drugs. Overall, 20% had a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration <100 mg/dl and 52% had a concentration <130 mg/dl. Some 42% had arterial blood pressures below 140/90 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease was detected in a high proportion of patients with an intermediate or high cardiovascular disease risk. The ankle-brachial index should be measured routinely in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease who are seen at internal medicine departments.

Valor de la determinación del índice tobillo-brazo en pacientes de riesgo vascular sin enfermedad aterotrombótica conocida: estudio VITAMIN / Clinical value of the ankle-brachial indexin patients at risk of cardiovascular disease but without known atherothrombotic disease: VITAMIN study

Introducción y objetivos. La detección de la enfermedad arterial periférica, mediante el índice tobillo-brazo, permite identificar a los pacientes asintomáticos con una lesión establecida. Investigamos la prevalencia de enfermedad arterial periférica (índice tobillo-brazo < 0,9) en sujetos sin enfermedad arterial conocida atendidos en el ámbito de medicina interna y su potencial impacto clínico-terapéutico. Métodos. Estudio multicéntrico, transversal, observacional en el que se incluyó a pacientes con potencial riesgo cardiovascular, seleccionados en función de la edad, el sexo y la presencia de factores de riesgo convencionales, pero sin enfermedad arterial conocida. Resultados. Se evaluaron 493 casos, de los que 174 eran diabéticos (35%) y 321, no diabéticos (65%). Sólo un 16% presentó un riesgo bajo según la ecuación de Framingham. Del total de la muestra, el índice tobillo-brazo fue < 0,9 en el 27,4% (el 37,9% de los diabéticos y el 21,3%, de los no diabéticos). En el análisis multivariable, los parámetros que se asociaron con un índice tobillo-brazo < 0,9 fueron la edad, la diabetes mellitus y la hipercolesterolemia. Se objetivó una relación significativa entre las categorías de riesgo de Framingham y el índice tobillo-brazo. Al considerar a los pacientes con un índice tobillo-brazo < 0,9, sólo el 21% recibía tratamiento antiagregante, el 20% presentaba valores de colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad (LDL) < 100 mg/dl (el 52% con LDL < 130 mg/dl) y el 42% tenía unos valores de presión arterial < 140/90 mmHg. Conclusiones. En una proporción elevada de pacientes con riesgo cardiovascular intermedio o alto se detecta enfermedad arterial periférica asintomática. El índice tobillo-brazo debería medirse sistemáticamente en enfermos con riesgo vascular, evaluados en el ámbito de la medicina interna

Introduction and objectives. Detecting peripheral arterial disease by measuring the ankle-brachial index can help identify asymptomatic patients with established disease. We investigated the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (i.e., an ankle-brachial index <0.9) and its potential clinical and therapeutic impact in patients with no known arterial disease who were seen at internal medicine departments. Methods. This multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study included patients at risk of cardiovascular disease who were selected on the basis of age, gender and the presence of conventional risk factors. No patient was known to have arterial disease. Results. The study included 493 patients, 174 (35%) of whom had diabetes, while 321 (65%) did not. Only 16% were in a low-risk category according to their Framingham score. An ankle-brachial index <0.9 was observed in 27.4%, comprising 37.9% of those with diabetes and 21.3% of those without. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors associated with an ankle-brachial index <0.9 were age, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia. There was a significant relationship between the ankle-brachial index and Framingham risk categories. Therapeutically, only 21% of patients with an ankle brachial index <0.9 were taking antiplatelet drugs. Overall, 20% had a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration <100 mg/dl and 52% had a concentration <130 mg/dl. Some 42% had arterial blood pressures below 140/90 mm Hg. Conclusions. Asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease was detected in a high proportion of patients with an intermediate or high cardiovascular disease risk. The ankle-brachial index should be measured routinely in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease who are seen at internal medicine departments